Tuya vs TTLock: Which Smart Lock Ecosystem Should You Sell?
Both ecosystems work. They suit different buyers, and choosing wrongly costs a lot of after-sales time.
Read the article →Buyers often read 'Bluetooth and Wi-Fi' as two ways of doing the same thing. They are not. One is for the person at the door and the other is for the person managing the building, and a lock needs both to do both.
Swipe the table sideways to see the full specification →
| Version | Bluetooth Low Energy 5.0 |
|---|---|
| Frequency | 2.402 to 2.480 GHz, the ISM band |
| Data rate | Up to 2 Mbps in the high-speed mode |
| Typical use | Phone-to-lock entry, configuration, fingerprint enrolment |
| Advantage | Opens without a network, and without a gateway |
Bluetooth is what makes a lock work in a building with no usable Wi-Fi. That is also why a Bluetooth-only lock is the right answer for some sites and the wrong answer for others.
Swipe the table sideways to see the full specification →
| Standard | 802.11 b/g/n |
|---|---|
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz only; 5 GHz is not supported |
| Data rate | Up to 72 Mbps, far more than a control command needs |
| Typical use | Remote unlock, status push, temporary codes, access history |
A Wi-Fi lock has to be given the network credentials during commissioning, which is the step that most often goes wrong on site. It needs a 2.4GHz network, and many modern routers default to 5GHz or to a combined SSID.
| Open the door from your phone at the door | Bluetooth | Faster, and no network needed |
|---|---|---|
| Unlock the door from another city | Wi-Fi | Bluetooth cannot reach |
| Push lock status and low-battery alerts | Wi-Fi | Needs a live connection |
| Timed or one-time codes | Wi-Fi to issue, lock to enforce | The code still expires without a network |
| Read the access history | Wi-Fi | Or a gateway on a Bluetooth lock |
| Enrol a fingerprint | Bluetooth or the panel | Usually done locally |
A gateway gives a Bluetooth lock the remote functions of a Wi-Fi lock. It sits between the lock and the router, so the lock keeps its low power draw while the site still gets remote control and a history.
Swipe the table sideways to see the full specification →
| Network at the site | 2.4GHz available and not locked to 5GHz |
|---|---|
| Radio in the model | BLE, Wi-Fi, or both, confirmed per model |
| Gateway requirement | Whether the remote functions need one |
| Ecosystem | Tuya or TTLock, chosen once for the whole site |
| Firmware and app version | Recorded on the sample you tested |
Test the radio in the building rather than on a desk. Concrete, metal doors and risers change the answer, and the site is where the answer matters.
Three questions this guide usually raises.
On this topic
No. It opens from the phone at the door without any network. What it cannot do without a gateway is be managed from somewhere else.
Almost always because the network is 5GHz or a combined SSID. The lock needs a 2.4GHz network during commissioning.
Neither on its own. Hotels usually need a gateway or Wi-Fi for the management side, plus local entry at the door, which is why the gateway count belongs in the quotation.
Both ecosystems work. They suit different buyers, and choosing wrongly costs a lot of after-sales time.
Read the article →The single most expensive misunderstanding in app-connected locks, and how to avoid it.
Read the article →The four measurements that decide whether a smart door lock order works.
Read the article →