Case Study: Holding a Padlock Programme When a Rival Undercut Our Cost
A rival quoted below our landed cost. The order was held by adding delivery certainty instead of cutting the price.
Read the article →A smart home integrator in the Caribbean was buying locks for a mix of retail customers and project work. The first complaint was not about the lock hardware at all: the app could only send an unlock request, and the end user expected the lock to open.
We confirmed in writing which versions support active unlock and which are request-based, and rebuilt the affected batch onto the version that unlocks actively from the phone.
The 60 mm mortise with a 22 x 200 mm body was engineered to the site measurements and supplied in a stainless version with an installation template. The first article was checked before the run continued.
A compliant invoice that did not carry the payment split was issued, and the battery-containing units were re-routed with their own documentation.
The relationship moved from a retail-scale account to a project account, and the non-standard body became a repeat specification.
Send the drawing and the door measurements, or describe the app behaviour you need. We will confirm what is possible before you commit.
A rival quoted below our landed cost. The order was held by adding delivery certainty instead of cutting the price.
Read the article →The first order was small enough that a mistake would not hurt. It was handled as if it were the bulk order.
Read the article →Both ecosystems work. They suit different buyers, and choosing wrongly costs a lot of after-sales time.
Read the article →