Case Study: From an App Complaint to a Non-Standard Mortise Project
Active unlock was the real problem, not the price. Fixing it opened a larger project.
Read the article →A door and gate contractor in Southeast Asia asked for a quotation on a fingerprint padlock programme with monthly volumes, plus the gateway needed to manage access from an office rather than from the gate.
A competing quotation came in below our own material cost. Matching it would have meant shipping at a loss on every carton, and the buyer had already learned that the lowest unit price is not the lowest programme cost.
The first order was a small trial. It was followed by repeat orders that grew to a monthly programme, because the buyer's own customers stopped reporting the problems that cheaper hardware had caused.
A lower unit price is not a lower programme cost if it comes with a padlock that will not join the gateway, a warranty that is not honoured, or a document set that delays clearance. If you are comparing quotes, compare those three items line by line.
Send the volume, the application and the gateway requirement and we will quote the package with the documents and warranty stated.
Active unlock was the real problem, not the price. Fixing it opened a larger project.
Read the article →The first order was small enough that a mistake would not hurt. It was handled as if it were the bulk order.
Read the article →Both ecosystems work. They suit different buyers, and choosing wrongly costs a lot of after-sales time.
Read the article →